Expert: James Balacco, Private trader and researcher of Syslinx
Start: February 21, 2006 - 7:30GMT
End: approx. 8:30GMT
Topics that will be covered for above session are:
- Knowing how much of your total allocation to spend on each trade
- Defining the Limits
- Understanding when to risk more or less
Who is James Balacco?
James Balacco has been a private trader and researcher for the past 15 Years. He hs spent many years studying Full time with Joe Rondinone the last living Student of W.D. Gann.
Speech Material:
A student was talking about trading being like horse racing. Instantly, I queried the comment and asked why he would think like that – his puzzled look told me all. My response to him was that the difference is control, using the following analogy to illustrate my point: My understanding is that if you place a bet on a horse race - lets say $10,000 on horse number 3 (for whatever reason) - and if the horse falls over, or if the horse comes last, or finishes other than first, you have lost your “investment”.
Trading is different. If I place the $10,000 with the “bookie” on horse number 3 and at the first 5 meters the horse falls, I immediately go to the bookie, sell my current position on that horse, taking back $9000 and the bookie keeps his $1000. I now see horse number 5 moving forward so I place my bet of $9000 on it. Then half way through the race, number 5 hits the front and I decide to cash in my position on this horse (at a reduced rate of winnings). None, the less, I have made 25%. I now have $11,250 and I place a bet on Horse number 8 as it looks to be gaining momentum. The race finishes and number 8 comes first, returning a 40% profit.
Minus some commission, the $15,750 I have made might be say, $15,000 even. The fact is, I had control at all stages. I could move around and select my targets and if I was losing I could swap and move to another selection. While this would be a gamblers dream or a bookies nightmare, you can’t do this on the track. However, you can do this in the market. My point is that it is vital to have the ability to keep control, to keep emotion and opinion out of the decision making. Rely only on fact and measurable evidence to support the position you are taking.
Nevertheless, over the past 15 years I have met many a “market player” who has the same attitude towards trading as they do to betting on horses. Once a trader applies control it can be further refined. In the above analogy you may have noticed that 100% of the capital was used on every “bet /trade”. In the long–term, this is a flawed approach and requires much greater thought and study to fully define the true value of each trade and the best allocation of your capital resources.
Knowing when to place a maximum or a reduced amount to each trade is very important, not only because of the risk, but because it should include the amount of supportive evidence to back up your decision to enter the trade.
Defining the intensity of your trade gives the trader a high degree of control and knowledge as to when to risk more or less within their limit. I may have $100,000 to trade, so I break down my risk in my portfolio to 10 stocks ( in laymen’s terms this enables the system to minimise the effect of placing “all your eggs in one basket” so to speak). Now each stock is allocated $10,000. However, placing $10,000 for each stock is not placing sufficient control on managing your trade.
The use of a “rating” technique becomes vital, as every entry is rarely the perfect setup. (A back-test is vital and necessary but it is often misunderstood, as the principle of finding a profitable system is not just your core concern.)
A simple way is to rate your entries – I use triple AAA, AA and A trades.
Effectively a “AAA” has multiple layers of mathematical levels supporting the entry position. AAA trades may only occur three times a month, but has never netted you an overall loss and has provided a high reward for the effort. Traders develop their own system to categorise their opportunities, whereas in the analogy above, I am not receiving tips (does that sound familiar?), or like the name of the horse or even like a particular number to determine my position.
“AA” trades are similar but do not have as many supportive rules and hence the trade is allocated a reduced amount of capital. “AA” trades occur more often and may provide an entry every week.
The “A” trade is a common trade with fewer mathematical arguments but still requires enough support rules to warrant the risk for the reward. “A” trades may occur every two to three days.
Effectively, the intensity of the entry is defined by the “rating”. Placing everything on each entry can be very costly, but by applying defined mechanical rules the trade can be controlled so that the trader knows the risk and the possible effect if it goes against them.
Even in an “AAA” trade the maximum - in this case $10,000 - is not allocated in full. Why? It is an often overlooked addition to trading – you may need to pyramid or add to your position and therefore a percentage is left to do this. This applies to futures and stocks.
Some groups of people apply a style in which they have a natural tendency to be conservative, while others have a more aggressive stance. Some people might ask, “Why not just trade the “AAA”?” While this is acceptable, you can then face issues of funds not working for you all the time with less frequent entries, so missing one would be painful. Increasing the portfolio size to 50 or 100 stocks would accommodate this. However, the “AA” and ” A” are profitable too, and some markets provide larger profits using the “AA” & “A” combined. You must prove your system’s capability, know it, and apply it.
One of the mathematical layers used to determine the rating system must be risk, with an “ AAA” trade having a lower risk than the “AA” and “A” trades.
Now that you have the principle in place, how do you apply this? The following is a basic example:
- “AAA” trade has only a 1 -2% risk on the trade entry and a reward of 50% or higher. You have three or more indicators that all indicate the same entry within the same range.
- “AA” trade has a risk of 3% - 5 % with a reward of 30% to 50% return, and you have two or more indicators indicating the same entry.
- “A” trades may have a 6% risk to a limit of 20% and provide a reward of better than 15% and at least one indicator.
Please note, the accuracy of the system is still 30% or better. As a general rule in trading, 30 % accuracy provides us with an acceptable profitability. Capital preservation is paramount and therefore control of each trade must be implemented.)
The accuracy for an “A” trade is still better than the “trade all entries” In the back test every trade is taken, however, when you apply the control, some of these trades will not match the criteria and won’t be included in your final trading plan. These are the trades that you stay away from. Remember, there are three positions - LONG, SHORT and STAND ASIDE.
To summarise, let’s look at a table of a Strategy, Rating, Money Management and Portfolio Management system. These four components are the basis of any trading system platform.
A $100,000 split to A AA AAA
1 stock1 4,000 6,500 8,500
2 stock2 4,000 6,500 8,500
3 stock3 4,000 6,500 8,500
4 stock4 4,000 6,500 8,500
5 stock5 4,000 6,500 8,500
6 stock 6 4,000 6,500 8,500
7 stock7 4,000 6,500 8,500
8 stock8 4,000 6,500 8,500
9 stock9 4,000 6,500 8,500
10 stock10 4,000 6,500 8,500
This gives you an idea of what a portfolio and allocation may look like. An entry which qualifies as an “A” trade would allow you to place $4000 into that trade, “AA” $6,500 and so on. Depending on their rating, stocks would be given different amounts from the fund allocation.
It is possible to advance the techniques by making the allocations dynamic so that funds are constantly in use, or add a secondary system to the rating system. By defining the control of each trade your performance should improve and your capital is preserved. Hope this has been helpful.
“Knowledge is the advance to success, but you cannot have knowledge unless there is understanding”.
James Balacco All Rights Reserved.
James has been a Private Trader and Researcher for the past 15 years. He has spent many years studying with Joe Rondinone, the last living student of W.D. Gann.
He can be contacted on jbalacco@syslinx.com.au -(08) 83038104
Derek Frey's FX Outlook
Expert: Derek Frey, Head Trader of Odom & Frey Futures & Options
Start: February 27, 2006 - 15:00GMT 10EST
End: approx. 16:00GMT 11EST
Topics that will be covered for above session are:
Do not miss your opportunity to be updated in your trading needs this week.
Who is Derek Frey?
Derek Frey has been a futures trader since 1989 and is Head Trader and partner at Odom & Frey Futures & Options, a firm that specializes in high probability, defined risk option spread trades for the futures markets. Derek is also co-author of O&F News & Views, a weekly newsletter that is published by several publications and over 20 financial websites including FXStreet.com
Speech Material:
EUR/USD: Moved my stops up to break even early in the week and then got stopped out there. So no harm no foul but I am a bit surprised by the resilience of the Dollar. With more and more traders beginning to expect the Fed to continue raising rates for the foreseeable future a strong Dollar could continue longer than we originally expected. I did however go long late today and will hold long over the weekend.
USD/CHF: Finally went short late today and will keep them over the weekend as well, stops working at 132.12
GBP/USD: Still long from late last week at 174 with current stops just below 173.50.
USD/JPY: What a week for the Yen! We went short at 119 and covered below 117 two days later! I now have a small short position on from 116.92 with a stop at 117.20. The range I mentioned last week was broken out of on the downside but so far has not really followed through. Look for momentum to pick up and I would not be surprised to see 116 hit early this coming week.
AUD/USD: Got stopped out at a small loss and am now standing aside. I have a slight bias to the bull side but will wait for a move back above 74.50 to confirm.
USD/CAD: Moved my stops up to my entry and got stopped out at breakeven. I did however go long at 114.93 over the weekend
Continue reading "Derek Frey's FX Outlook " »
Posted by ClaireFlaherty in Expert Q&A Sessions, Market Viewpoint & Live Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)